Notice: Undefined offset: 0 in /home/rmhu6fn7r820/public_html/wp-content/themes/opskill-123help/functions.php on line 75
Notice: Trying to get property 'status' of non-object in /home/rmhu6fn7r820/public_html/wp-content/themes/opskill-123help/functions.php on line 75
Essay > Words: 419 > Rating: Excellent > Buy full access at $1
NYT article “Getting Rid of Big Currency Notes”
The difference in writings determines whether an article if factual or opinionated. Regardless of which direction an article takes in some case, even factual articlescontain fallacies. It is natural to argue based on personal or group interests. Taking a look at the article by AARON KLEIN titled “Getting Rid of Big Currency Notes”, the article contains some fallacies. This article explains how the introduction of $1 would help in cutting budget and thus reducing budget bills.
The type of fallacy presented in this article is syllogism fallacy. This fallacy is normally used to arrive at conclusion that are unusual. Syllogismfallacy is a false argument as it implies an incorrect conclusion. Though the author is an insider and a former deputy assistant secretary of the Treasury between the years 2009 and 2013, the reduction in spending $13 billion is not factual and realizable. The author states “conservative estimate of the Government Accountability Office, and more than $13 billion in
Type: Essay || Words: 419 Rating || Excellent Subscribe at $1 to view the full document.
Buy access at $1