NYT article “Drone warfare and civilian deaths”

Notice: Undefined offset: 0 in /home/rmhu6fn7r820/public_html/wp-content/themes/opskill-123help/functions.php on line 75

Notice: Trying to get property 'status' of non-object in /home/rmhu6fn7r820/public_html/wp-content/themes/opskill-123help/functions.php on line 75

Essay > Words: 389 > Rating: Excellent > Buy full access at $1

NYT article “Drone warfare and civilian deaths”






There are always various aspects of writings. Each writer naturally leans towards their views or their sides of the story. Some articles thus end being opinionated or one-sided. The opinionatedarticles are based on the personal views of the person writing it like the article “Drone warfare and civilian deaths”by Manuela Mirkos. The author details how drones have been more harmful than killing the targeted terrorist groups.

The fallacy presented in this article is illogical conclusion. Illogical conclusion fallacy is a case whereby the writer attests a conclusion that does not follow from the suggestions provided. The author can be credited for writing from his own personal experience of encounter and experience of how the USA drone targeted to eradicate the terrorist have ended up killing civilians. The writer coming from Yemen has had personal contacts with the victims. However, the conclusion arrived by the writer that the entire drone program is ineffective is a fallacy. The writer, with the sympathy of the .............

Type: Essay || Words: 389 Rating || Excellent

Subscribe at $1 to view the full document.

Buy access at $1